• Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • World News
Grand Expo Event
Editor's PickInvesting

Good Riddance to Grad PLUS Student Loans

by July 8, 2025
July 8, 2025

Andrew Gillen and Neal McCluskey

student loans

There are many things to like and dislike in the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) enacted last week. One of the best things the law does is eliminate Grad PLUS, the worst of all the federal student loan programs. It is a type of loan available only to graduate students (e.g., master’s degree and above), and it operates on top of standard student loans. 

Grad PLUS deserved to die for several reasons, including for the good of future job seekers and students.

First, Grad PLUS endangered students by undermining student lending’s guardrails. Without limits, some students will borrow too much, which is why undergraduate federal loans are capped at $31,000 ($57,500 for independent students). Graduate students can borrow up to $138,500 through the standard student loan program, which is already a towering sum. Grad PLUS kicks in once students reach that limit, which, of course, defeats the purpose of limiting standard loans.

When you hear about students with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, Grad PLUS is the reason. One borrower even racked up a million dollars in debt. Eliminating Grad PLUS would prevent many of these cases of reckless overborrowing.

Second, Grad PLUS was a massive drain on taxpayers. Many grad borrowers enter income-driven repayment, where their monthly payments are a function of their income, not how much they borrow. Any remaining balance is also forgiven after ten to twenty-five years, meaning that a significant portion of Grad PLUS loans will never be repaid, imposing a massive cost on taxpayers.

The latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office indicate that taxpayers lose around 24 cents for every dollar of lending in Grad PLUS. Ironically, Grad PLUS was created two decades ago because it was believed that the government could make money from these loans, and the “profits” would be used to finance higher government spending. Not only did those profits never materialize, but the losses are now so high that eliminating Grad PLUS would save taxpayers almost $50 billion over the next decade. 

Third, Grad PLUS fueled tuition inflation in graduate programs. The latest research finds that “the creation of Grad PLUS led to significantly higher program prices… sticker prices went up approximately dollar for dollar with increases in federal loans.” Needless to say, the point of student loans is not to funnel more money into colleges’ coffers.

Fourth, Grad PLUS subsidized wasteful education. Many college degrees have positive economic payoffs because the degree increases the borrower’s earnings potential enough to justify borrowing. But some programs fail this economic test because students borrow too much relative to the change in their earnings potential. Operating such programs is a wasteful use of resources, leaving both borrowers and taxpayers worse off. But colleges still profit from these programs because they are paid up front and get to keep all that money regardless of the impact on borrowers and taxpayers. Grad PLUS makes this problem worse by heavily subsidizing such programs. Many colleges have responded by not just maintaining these programs but creating more of them, treating these programs like Grad PLUS-grazing cash cows.

Finally, easy borrowing pushed credential inflation—job-seekers needing higher and higher degrees for positions that did not previously require them. Grad PLUS helps to keep this accelerating employment treadmill running by supplying funds to pay for more diplomas, but, too often, not meaningfully increased skills or knowledge.

Undoubtedly, many people see Grad PLUS as an important tool to make higher education affordable. But it has the opposite effect, making graduate education an increasingly expensive requirement that is often a millstone around society’s neck. Now that Grad PLUS is history, we say good riddance.

previous post
The Mythology of Methodological Collectivism
next post
Dr. Steve Hanke, Leading Authority on Hyperinflation, Named Mises Institute Senior Distinguished Scholar

You may also like

Private School Survey: What’s Behind Seemingly Cooling Enrollment?

July 30, 2025

Minimum Wage Increases Hurt Lower-Skilled Workers

July 30, 2025

Alina Habba and the Problems with Acting Officers

July 30, 2025

Reforming Labor Union Laws

July 29, 2025

Is AI a Horse or a Zebra When...

July 28, 2025

The AI Action Plan: Taking AI Innovation Seriously

July 28, 2025

College Student Aid Theft

July 28, 2025

Can the White House Denaturalize Domestic Opponents?

July 25, 2025

An Updated Interview with George Selgin on Free...

July 25, 2025

Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to...

July 25, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Private School Survey: What’s Behind Seemingly Cooling Enrollment?

      July 30, 2025
    • Minimum Wage Increases Hurt Lower-Skilled Workers

      July 30, 2025
    • Alina Habba and the Problems with Acting Officers

      July 30, 2025
    • Reforming Labor Union Laws

      July 29, 2025
    • Is AI a Horse or a Zebra When It Comes to the First Amendment?

      July 28, 2025
    • The AI Action Plan: Taking AI Innovation Seriously

      July 28, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 grandexpoevent.com | All Rights Reserved

    Grand Expo Event
    • Investing
    • Tech News
    • Stock
    • World News