• Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • World News
Grand Expo Event
Editor's PickInvesting

Federal Bank Regulators Are Right to Rescind Climate Principles

by October 20, 2025
October 20, 2025

Jai Kedia and Jerome Famularo

Reforming the Federal Reserve - Small

On October 16, the Fed, FDIC, and OCC rescinded interagency principles for climate-related financial risk management for large financial institutions. This is a positive development and a rare occasion when regulators narrow their scope.

There were many problems with the principles, as was pointed out by Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman. Most importantly, the principles far exceed the narrow mandate of the Fed, which is stable inflation and maximum employment. It is wrong to use financial regulation to fight climate change.

Mission creep into politically charged areas that the Fed cannot directly influence only serves to distract the central bank from its core monetary policy functions. For instance, during the pandemic, the Fed missed its inflation target when it was more focused on distributional labor market outcomes. The Fed was 20 months too late to raise the rate target, which was likely a factor that entrenched and elevated inflation.

Financial institutions already manage risk, and they should focus on those risks that are material to their investors. Diversions into partisan fields such as climate risk are a distraction, and to the extent that climate risk matters, it will already be included by banks in their risk calculations. To the extent that it doesn’t matter for banks’ risk calculations, these requirements lead to distortions in important price signals.

Additionally, unnecessary requirements also lead to unintended consequences such as more expensive or reduced lending due to the added regulatory compliance costs. Not only were firms expected to engage in long-term scenario analysis that stretched far past typical scenario time horizons, but there is also no clarity for the future path of climate-related policy. Vague statements in the principles meant that financial institutions faced unclear expectations and the risk of ever-tightening regulation.

The principles would also focus on “transition risk,” which refers to the risk faced by a firm from a shift to a low-carbon economy. Banks were expected to consider carbon-intensive firms as risky, thus increasing lending costs for those companies. This is problematic because the focus on this risk tries to arbitrarily constrain carbon-intensive firms through financial regulation.

The rescission acknowledges these problems and is a great step in the right direction. Now, the Fed can continue to reduce its regulatory scope and focus entirely on its dual mandate. It should then implement rules-based monetary policy to constrain discretion and create a more stable and predictable monetary regime.

previous post
Government Science Is an Oxymoron
next post
What Will the Next Gold Bust Look Like?

You may also like

The Fed’s MBS Problem: How QE Helped Inflate...

October 23, 2025

European States Can Lead Militarily–a New Cato Policy...

October 23, 2025

End Obamacare’s Welfare for the Wealthy COVID Credits

October 23, 2025

When the FDA Becomes Political, Patients’ Autonomy Suffers

October 23, 2025

“Temporary and Targeted” Fiscal Stimulus?

October 22, 2025

AI and Healthcare: A Policy Framework for Innovation,...

October 21, 2025

Artificial Intelligence Needs Electricity, and Electricity Needs Freedom

October 20, 2025

Introducing a New Blog Series on AI and...

October 20, 2025

Uruguay Legalizes Euthanasia

October 17, 2025

Friday Feature: CASCO Learning

October 17, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • The Fed’s MBS Problem: How QE Helped Inflate Housing Markets

      October 23, 2025
    • European States Can Lead Militarily–a New Cato Policy Analysis

      October 23, 2025
    • End Obamacare’s Welfare for the Wealthy COVID Credits

      October 23, 2025
    • When the FDA Becomes Political, Patients’ Autonomy Suffers

      October 23, 2025
    • “Temporary and Targeted” Fiscal Stimulus?

      October 22, 2025
    • AI and Healthcare: A Policy Framework for Innovation, Liability, and Patient Autonomy—Part 1

      October 21, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 grandexpoevent.com | All Rights Reserved

    Grand Expo Event
    • Investing
    • Tech News
    • Stock
    • World News